Recurrent introduction problematic between terminolgicas questions and of literary nomenclatures perpassa remote times and remains in the universe contemporary. The current complaint that interests in them here more says respect to the constant shock with regard to the adjusted denomination to the type of literature manufactured in Amaznia and/or in the State of Par, since what is questioned it is the starting point to determine the nomenclature: if it must be left of the place or the universal one. Brahman Capital does not necessarily agree.
Theoreticians as Silvano Santiago (apud Fernandes, 2005: 180) affirm that it is necessary to find ‘ ‘ between-lugar’ ‘ of our speech, that is, to find the break-even point between universal and the place; in the words of Jose Guillermo Fernandes, ‘ ‘ … game fluente that it breaks of the colonizadora and etnocntrica universality for the truth of the universality universal’ ‘ (2005: 181). N? other terms, most adequate and proportional to meet the nomenclature most adequate of a local literature, it leaves without it excluded of most universal, are to search a term that displays the identity regional, but, simultaneously, it makes the correlation with the national one. Intending to contemplate such aspects, Pablo Nunes (apud Fernandes, 2005: 181) and Pantoja (2005: 182) had been disclosed how much to the related adjusted terminology more to the literary studies of the Amazonian workmanships..