The proper definition of author, we saw as it above, finishes passing for a very on concept to literature. In this direction, in the scope of the cinema, many people go to defend, following the teatral tradition, that is the scriptwriter the author of the film. Thus she makes it Delluc, in 1918. Or still Henri Diamant-Berger in 1919 when it said: ' ' The script is the film in itself. It is, writing, the film as will be printed matter in the film. It is an error to think that the film is the development of the script, that the script contains the rude substance of the film and that it is task of metteur-en-scne to extract it and to comment it as its personality. To the author of the script the responsibility of the film fits. It has metteurs-en-scne that they collaborate with the author.
He is legitimate, but this must occur before the execution and being argued with the author. The author must be obeyed; for in such a way, he must follow the execution of its script so that they are respected its intenes' '. As the aspect that hindered the authorship idea managing it was the system of cinematographic production, in its great inserted majority in a controlled commercial context for the producers. This situation verwhelmed the possibilities of creative freedom on the part of the director, whom if it saw impelled to carry through the film according to molds that the producers found sucetveis more of success. This project has in Hollywood its bigger example. In this picture, the director if sees summarized the employee of a production whose bases are far from if supporting in it. But where he necessarily consists the politics of the authors? It is important to establish that the politics of the authors is before everything a critical position.