This information made me him up to a Degree likeable, because I have always great respect and much sympathy for freedom fighters. That Wagner all people had used the substance known to me, from my Sagenbuch Wieland legend to transport his revolutionary ideas, how his distaste for tyrants and oppression to express, surprised me, especially as the Wieland of legend for me had been a right tear-jerker. In any case, not a hero, with which I could necessarily identify me or wanted as a child. In the essay, after all the name similar play was being Wagner’s unfinished revolution epic Karl vollmoeller called “Wieland” compared to, I was inside already committed. Media criticism or rebuke, especially since, if it is justified, is my thing. In this respect somewhat krude coming therefore text full MacLeod the Tunnat original quotes in selection, more and more onlookers pulled me.
Because at least I realized like two writing editors, one a composer, the other a lyrically strong playwright, is a universally seize known substance and reshape it in their respective meaning, use, use, shape it and thus make their message almost to the man, or among the people. Tunnat the “Parcival” full MacLeod faces still “Parsifal” Wagner’s within his essayistic comparison. This also in a pleasant, rather loose way that it me erleicherte me through another issue not necessarily interesting for me to read. I acknowledge that the author succeeded, a fact which me, frankly little interested, so vivid and well described to present, that I felt the time that was needed to read me through the chapter, not as wasted time. For Kudos to this place! More start I could by Wagner and full Moeller with biographical information about the residences, especially since I like to and much travel, and know the described places from personal observations. The following chapter, as the about the “miracle” or even the cult film “The Blue Angel” entertained me very good during the reading. Little by little I started to be able to follow the thought processes of Tunnats and could see what the “gesamtkunstwerk lived full Moeller” is set. That besides the author, succeeded to dismantle my dislike to Wagner across, if not, but to transform approaches of sympathy, total to expand my horizons about Wagner, the concept of the “gesamtkunstwerk” in a pleasant way, makes me to pronounce Frederik Tunnat my respect for his essay.
The reading is even for someone like me – a Wagner despiser – no wasted time on the contrary. Here, Tony Parker expresses very clear opinions on the subject. I can do not to appreciate whether or how much Wagner friends or connoisseurs can enjoy the reading. However, I can say without exaggeration that the book as a whole provides an enriching read full Moeller almost a must is for friends, and also helps the essay come now out of fashion again to new life. Conclusion: Readers, to whom the name Wagner or full MacLeod means something, be reading sure enjoy. The book is thoroughly researched, well, in some places almost loosely written, as already present biographical work Tunnats of. The author succeeds convincingly, to introduce the concept of the “gesamtkunstwerk”, as well as to present its different implementation in Wagner and full Moeller. A book, certainly not for everyone, this quite definitely something for literary interested and educated readers. Even people with Wagner allergy, like me, are wasting their time nor their money. Absolutely empfehlens in short: for the right reader circles – and worth a read. F. of Rosdorf